True, but when what we “hear from” them is incitement to violence, it has to be stopped. But the decision shouldn’t be unilaterally in the hands of private companies. They need to follow clear national laws, not just their own internal “rules”.
-
-
-
I agree there’s a debate on who should make this decision (and we’ve been debating for years how to regulate online space) but differing national laws make this challenging. Do we ban any post that could incite violence (Trump did not directly)? My concern is where the line is
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
My issue is it feels like an editorial decision. Other influential accounts spew similar (and in some cases worse) bile and don’t get suspended. Ideally you want online spaces to reflect national laws on free speech. But achieving that is a huge challenge.
Einde van gesprek
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.