Sounds very benign but often what gets middle class communities agitated is the prospect of social housing being built near them. There has to be a middle point recognising community rights that doesn't turn into a NIMBY charter.https://twitter.com/FerretScot/status/1001014713231298560 …
-
-
Als antwoord op @MhairiHunter
See also, anything that might employ people.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 3 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @DrewSm1th @MhairiHunter
surely the key is setting planning priorities democratically/locally then properly fund planning departments to deliver on those policies. Layers of appeals don't support the less listened to groups.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @kaysillars @DrewSm1th
Yes. There need to be higher standards at the pre-planning stage.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
In most cases, any pre-planning would be preferable to the current system where deals are agreed, money changes hands and only the finished plan is up for public comment.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @GaryCushway @MhairiHunter en
In 2006, Malcolm Chisholm dismissed calls for equal rights of appeal because his new approach to front-end loading the system was going to sort everything. In 2018, Kevin Stewart has dismissed calls for equal rights because ... indeed.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @jonmolyneuxSGP @MhairiHunter en
I can see where it could become difficult in some circumstances when people are awkward, irrational and reactionary about some things. But there’s at least room for improvement.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
The point is that ERA proposals involve giving a very limited right of appeal to communities. Certainly a long way from a naysayers Charter. But they would be made equal by curbing the applicant’s appeal rights too.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.