Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
Here’s a guide for the garbage punditry you’ll hear over the next few weeks about the Supreme Court fight: If a confident assertion about how voters will react isn’t backed up by any data or reporting whatsoever, don’t just ignore it - challenge it.
We just had months of pundits confidently telling us exactly how Trump’s law and order bullshit would play, and they were all proven wrong by nearly every piece of available data. The inability to show some kind of humility and patience about this stuff is exhausting.
This cuts both ways of course. It *could* galvanize Republicans given how the nomination process plays out... who it is... how Dems react, etc. We just don't know yet b/c it hasn't happened.
What’s your gut tell you this time?
I've given up on pundits. The bigger concern is reality itself. Which appears to be disintegrating.
I really don’t think swing voters care about this kind of stuff. But the fact that this appointment could end ACA, that could matter.
We need memes, they only speak meme
I’m so sad
Three fourths of the country is self-medicating
Pundits are totally witless. So I'd love it if y'all @crookedmedia would look into the #PeopleofPraise and Amy Coney Barrett. It's a charismatic cult like the one that's been trying to get me fired from @UofT for the past year, akin to #WordofFaith exposed by @mitchsweiss
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
