Yes and he was voted in by the electorate. He does not take £1.75m public funds whilst engaging in tax avoidance and virtue signalling about austerity.
It http://did.No http://longer.It is a political party with elected representatives . It has never cost £1 .75m pa and does pretend to be sonething it is not .Your point ?
-
-
My point is you argued UKIP did not receive public money. This is clearly wrong. Plus someone earning billions or minimum wage have the right to an opinion. Hamilton says he should not have an opinion and keep quiet. Frankly I think lineker has a legitimate point.
-
http://No.You said UKIP got public funds for its campaigns. It does not.Hamilton is using a gambit to show the hypocrisy of Lineker who gets a kleptocrat-style public funded salary does tax avoidance and yet complains about austerity . Walk the walk or change the tune
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.