This is why what @nytimes does matters & why @jonathanweisman's anger at criticism of misleading headlines was so misplaced. The D's offered the R's everything they said they wanted, funding 4 the wall included--& the R's blew up each deal. That's gotta make it into the Gray Ladyhttps://twitter.com/costareports/status/954735132996440065 …
First of all, that was in the @nytimes in great detail. I highly recommend the story.
-
-
You do know a) that the argument was about the hed, which framed the Ds as the actors, & that b) we know you know this, wh. makes the Snidely Whipladh bit above so...indicative.
@nytimes folks inability to hear criticism is hurting the paper. You can do better, but not like this.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But thanks for taking the trouble to reply, even so. Baby steps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, you kinda do. But you aren’t the only one at your shop. It really amazes me, and I’m not snarking here, how so many really talented folks w. whom you work can’t perform the work needed not to repeat the mistakes of 2016. I wish you would. We need a superlative
@nytimes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Your headline was crap and helps set a false narrative no matter what is in the article. You dishonesty is staggering.
-
It's not dishonesty, IMHO. Weissman's reaction STM of a piece with someone who works w/in an institutional culture in which it is very hard, perhaps impossible to hear outside criticism, and in a professional culture in wh. it's simply a given everyone reads the whole article.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But not the implication of the headline. Hence the fail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.