Because it (a) ignores the fact they made some cuts expire just to avoid the filibuster, and (b) it absolves them of making the middle class tax cuts expire by assuming someone else will fix that problem later.
-
-
-
You should check out this good explainer: https://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/krugman/2017/11/24/schroedingers-tax-hike/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's the Times now, and for the past 18 mos.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they expire on time, it fits reconciliation. If it doesn't, they are lying to get it through reconciliation. You want to ignore this and accuse people pointing out of being disingenuous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NYT becomes more pro-Republican and pro-Trump every day. And of course lack the self awareness to realize it. Plus they never admit mistakes. It is a secret pledge all NYT reporters must take.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You question the critics as disingenuous but nowhere says the advocates as cynical. Those are supposedly be deficit hawks!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The GOP isn't intentionally hurting the middle class They're just pushing them off the cliff safe in the knowledge that superman COULD fly in and save them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.