This is a liberal embarrassment. You don't even have to read @BretStephensNYT column but you can't stand thought of a conservative presence. https://twitter.com/seankent/status/858117328143212544 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Have you considered possibility that we read it and concluded it is really poorly reasoned. Even hyperlink he cites contradicts his point
I would hope that if you reached that reasonable conclusion, your next thought would not be "nah nah nah, I can't hear you. I'm canceling"
-
-
Let me point out: if you worked at any other company and bullied a consumer on social media like this for giving feedback, you'd be fired.
-
If Coca-Cola added rat feces to its formula, would it be OK for them to tell customers "you're just too dumb to appreciate how good it is."
-
That is exactly what you're doing, right now. Your paper had a serious lapse of editorial standards, ppl are complaining, and you're...
-
...acting like we're idiots for wanting actual quality science reporting instead of dramatized obfuscation of established climate facts.
-
And for one who talks down to us for daring to question the Gods of Journalism, you seem very shaky on basic concepts like fact vs opinion.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe your inability to distinguish principled revulsion at deliberate promotion of disinfo from "nah nah nah" is why people are canceling.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fair enough but it would help to know whether the paper's position is that it will publish that which is false in order to provoke debate
-
I suppose that could be a defensible editorial policy but you might just want to say so.
-
NYT often publishes false info on op-ed pg. But it's the op-ed pg. Plus – smtimes it's impt to know what sm1 thinks esp if s/he's wrong. 1/
-
Op-ed pages exist not to give us the news. They exist to let us know what people are thinking. The news is on the other pages. 2/2
-
Was never under impression, nor said, that op-ed is news. NYT op ed page is often said to be the single most valuable piece of real estate
-
Yet you seem to want to hold op-ed page to news-page standards. If I'm wrong about that, let me know. (srsly)
-
1 Let me try to explain myself. We can agree that it would be fine to publish a piece about how anti-smoking campaigns do not work.
-
2 Or a piece about how tobacco litigation is counter productive. Those positions can be debated.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I subscribed because I thought they were making the world better. If I think the balance has tipped, I'll cancel.
-
I can get propaganda for free pretty much anywhere on the Internet. I have no obligation to pay for it.
-
Your refusal to distinguish between pro- and anti-fact "opinion" because it might make you look partisan is deeply concerning to me.
-
Why should I keep funding that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.