This is a liberal embarrassment. You don't even have to read @BretStephensNYT column but you can't stand thought of a conservative presence. https://twitter.com/seankent/status/858117328143212544 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I read many conservative voices. Isn't David Brooks a conservative voice? I read his columns. However, David Brooks is not a science denier.
-
-
Dismissing climate models as mere probabilities is denying science. Complaining about scientism is denying science. I read the article.
-
Clearly the subscription cancellation is justified because newsroom is on board with the propaganda.
-
when the only answer they have to send a Dep editor to gaslight spam on twitter you know they know they have fox newsed their paper.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bret Stephens misrepresents Revkin's comments in an attempt to build skepticism abt climate science. Disinformation. https://m.facebook.com/andrew.revkin.5/posts/10156090701266040 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You didn't read the replies.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is the slimiest, most disingenuous reply imaginable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Editor of gaslighting on Twitter? You need to get out of DC soon, the admin has you believing typed = true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You accuse people of not reading the column. When they prove you wrong, instead of apologizing, you change the subject
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you say this often enough, eventually you'll be right! And apparently that level of concern for truth is enough to get you a NYT column.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
You keep making this assertion then ignoring when people cite passages showing what they are upset about. Perhaps people read it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes we did. The column was rubbish. Make a different argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have any other reply?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You know, the fact that you keep saying this over and over again has made up my mind. I don't need to pay $150 a year for your arrogance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is a bad Brooks clone. You could have hired a relevant, truthful conservative like Larison. Can't say truth matters but climate lies OK.
-
[extremely Jon Weisman voice] but jooooosh you didn't read the cooooolummmmn
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Take it up with
@BruceBartlett! I want my money back Will call on Monday We simply want TRUTH in reporting! How hard is it man? -
Better idea: complain loudly but keep your subscription.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How bout his thoughts on Arabs having broken evil brains?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.