Talk is cheap and we don't have the luxury of time on this matter
I repeat, either you didn't read the column or you didn't comprehend it. Nowhere did it say climate change doesn't exist. He argued for talk
-
-
-
You didn't read the column.
-
This many replies just telling people they didn't read the column instead of responding to points has certainly lowered my opinion of NYT.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's settled issue. Like asking for "talk" on the reality of the holocaust. Worse. Because"Talk" means delay, & delay here is deadly.
-
I guess the Washington Post also "didn't read the column."https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/04/30/new-york-times-editor-pens-weak-vague-response-to-critics-of-bret-stephenss-op-ed-on-climate-change/?utm_term=.dc935fcf4330 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Walk me through the rape denial, calling BLM thugs and arguing that arabs have diseased minds. What important debates does racism yield?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
he attacked straw men & argued for talk about degree of climate change not talk about reasonable policies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.