(((JonathanWeisman)))Verified account

Lol, now you're down to just insulting people? What a winning strategy.

People have an issue with a hack column, and you accuse them of either not reading or comprehending it? So much disrespect to NYT readers.

Sounds kind of authoritarian. If you disagree you're dumb or didn't read it. Please...

are you trying to prove that Bret Stephens isn't the worst voice at NYT? Mission accomplished Mr Weispam.

Regrettable tweet.

Same accusation over and over. Pretty annoying.

I read the column -the Clinton-bashing to start certainly is a stupid way to open a dialogue-but reminded me of continual HRC bashing by NYT

Here we see the NYT insulting its readership. Way to loose readers.

article used several intellectually dishonest tactics,worst being Bret's perception of HOW climate case is presented justifies dismissing it

Incredibly condescending

You guys have done nothing but trip over your own shoelaces for the past year, and you're gonna talk down to people? Get your shit together.

Keep returning to this tweet in disbelief. What shameful behavior from @nytimes editorial. This rudeness to your readers is mind boggling.

Well aren't you special, and smarter than anybody.

Yeah I guess I cancelled my NYT subscription cuz me 2 stoopid 2 kno wat wurds meen Not because you're all proud to be wrong all the time

Was gonna cancel after election- but trump telling his fans to cancel changed my mind

Your defense & condescending remarks aren't helpful & fuel problem of @nytimes creation; if you don't accept Stephens it's liberal failure