![[Oldspice whistle]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/834859239893921792/jol17jsf_normal.jpg)
The implication that without Stein all of those voters would have chosen Clinton is not necessarily true.
It's official: @HillaryClinton lost Pennsylvania by 44,292 votes. @DrJillStein got 49,941.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
those are actually unconnected, but hey, you do you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Incorrect: she lost PA by lying and lying and lying and lying and... http://arkancide.com
-
and lying
-
Ha ha... Yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Boab10 This matters because Clinton has a right to Stein's votes?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a pointless exercise
-
I fundamentally disagree.
-
Gore lost Florida by a couple hundred votes. What makes you think 44,000 stein voters would've gone democrat?
-
I guess I'm just naive. Stein voters hated HRC so much they thought she'd usher in govt run by oil and finance execs. Look what we have now.
-
I guess I'm just fed up with your animosity for a tiny sliver of people who voted 3rd party. What about the millions who didn't vote at all?
-
You're right, animosity is a good word to describe it.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
false equivalence
-
Why is it false? No Republicans switched parties to vote for
@DrJillStein. She only took votes from HRC. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I edited your tweet and made it smarter. You're welcome.pic.twitter.com/r4J38RW2HQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.