OMG Sequester was bipartisan? No wonder NYT is a ghost of its former self
Amazing to think failure of the benighted Super Committee 5 years ago is still bedeviling our politics in 2016. Sequestration is bipartisan
-
-
-
@mattyglesias Dems protected the most vulnerable pgms like Medicaid, food stamps. GOP got its cuts.http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/us/politics/parties-focus-on-the-positive-as-budget-cuts-near.html?pagewanted=all&referer= … -
Just more NYT false equivalence. We all shld try to focus on the positive before the executioner's ax falls
-
Read the story. I was there. I have covered Congress since 1996. Learn something.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And/or failure of Super Committee's antecedents - Obama/Boehner talks, Bowles-Simpson.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
bipartisan? Lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and you are a deputy editor for The New York Times?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but didn't demos agree to include sequestration only b/c they thought it would never take effect?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.