Facing possible veto-proof majority, Obama would sign bipartisan Iran compromise as now formulated. @jonathanweismanhttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/15/us/senators-reach-deal-on-iran-nuclear-talks.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news …
-
-
Replying to @peterbakernyt
@peterbakernyt@JRubinBlogger@jonathanweisman Of course he would. He now only needs 34 votes instead of 67-big win for Obama1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cajunkate
@cajunkate@JRubinBlogger@jonathanweisman That was the case with the original bill he said he would veto too. No change in that regard.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @peterbakernyt
@peterbakernyt@JRubinBlogger@jonathanweisman so what compromises were made?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @cajunkate
@cajunkate @peterbakernyt @JRubinBlogger Read the story, not the Tweets! Shorter review period, took out terrorism precondition.
7:42 AM - 15 Apr 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.