@jthnews For, but in pursuit if revenue-neutral tax reform that lowers top tax rates, not to pay for deficit reduction or sequester
-
@jonathanweisman @jthnews but that's a huge flip flop from 2 months ago. He put $1 trillion in revenue on the table before Xmas
True“@pfeiffer44: @jonathanweisman @jthnews that's huge flip flop from 2 months ago. He put $1 trillion in revenue on the table before Xmas”
-
-
That WH ignored. Why? MT
@pfeiffer44:@jonathanweisman @jthnews that's a flip. He put $1 trillion in revenue on the table before Xmas”” -
@BDayspring@jonathanweisman @jthnews no he didn't, the speaker pulled his offer for Plan B. Our offer is still on the table -
@pfeiffer44@bdayspring @jthnews No reason why rates can't be revisited in a +$1 t tax reform.@SpeakerBoehner still says his was last offer -
@jonathanweisman@BDayspring. With out deficit, using all loophole closing for more tax cuts instead of deficit reduction makes no sense -
Unless, of course, you were focused on creating jobs. Using on more spending as WH wants makes least sense
@pfeiffer44@jonathanweisman -
@BDayspring@jonathanweisman you are too smart to just spit trite talking points,you know its for deficit reduction, we have a spending deal -
Correct, that's why I'm not. Instead, u send me to the website of an offer - half of which is already law
@pfeiffer44@jonathanweisman -
@BDayspring@jonathanweisman its not law, this really doesnt have to be this hard. Taking a position that you wont compromise ever is crazy - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.