Respectfully, the email from Schmidt to Kortan (at least as quoted in the Examiner article) never poses the question if Kortan can confirm, deny or otherwise has comment on this info. One can see how this can be interpreted as Schmidt providing info, not asking for a comment.
Confirming your story about an FBI investigation of a meeting between your son-in-law and a Russian operative with the FBI is not only legal. It is the only ethical way to do journalism. The events were then confirmed in the Mueller Report.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1142044450413301760 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which proves once again he hasn’t read it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Mueller report has been discredited. As an honest reporter you should know this by now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Wanted to flag you on something “ is how the email starts. That’s not asking for confirmation, that’s informing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.