(((JonathanWeisman)))Verified account

One is a fluff piece for a horrible human being who used the country's resources to pursue a political vendetta. The other was a hit piece put together by a newspaper with an irrational hatred of the Clintons who's entire political coverage is soaked in disdain for Democrats.

Keep digging guys

Is the issue that they quoted moms or that they didn't make explicit to a lay-person the standards of "on/off the record"?

Why are you legitimizing this fraud? His only talent is the ability to bleat louder than the people around him.

Yeah but come on.... her mom didn’t even know she was interviewed on the record. She’s an old lady. What the hell.

Quoting other moms isn’t the issue obviously. The method to get the quotes was surreptitious and reflects poorly on the paper. But I’m certain you know this and the easy fix would be to apologize

You know whose mom the NYT didn't quote? Faiz Shakir's.

It wasn’t a profile. Stop doubling down in defense of obviously shitty journalistic practices.

Or hey....you could always get the FBI to say your reporters did nothing shady. I bet that would help.

You're so proud of this puff piece for a vicious political hack who wasted time and money to falsely attack Hillary Clinton. Weird that it isn't about Dean Baquet.

You guys are in serious need of perspective. The circling the wagons is indicative of a serious group think organization. Can’t take any criticism at all? Very bad look. You’re spoiling all those good feelings your book gave me.

Lol NYT. Stop tweeting.

@nytimes keep digging the hole, you’ll get out eventually.