(((JonathanWeisman)))Verified account

I do not know if you are a Jewish antisemite, but your ideology prevents you from seeing the reality of the new antisemitic wave originating from the US Congress. Your ideological refusal to condemn the antisemitism from your side of the political divide supports this wave. Sad.

From (((Semitism))): "Intolerance has led many in Europe – and some in the American academy and fringe left – to make a dangerous leap: The Jews in our midst must renounce Israel or suffer the consequences that they themselves have brought on. ..."

"...The Jew brings on himself the hate that he has suffered through the millennia – a rejoinder that links the far right anti-Semite to the far- left. It is how the leader of Britain’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, could call Hamas and Hezbollah “friends," ..."

"how another Labour leader, Jackie Walker, could call Jews “chief financiers of the slave trade,” and how, in the words of a Parliamentary inquiry, Corbyn, now so close to No. 10 Downing Street, could have “created what some have referred to as a ‘safe space’ for ..."

*Writes a book on American Anti-Semitism* *Doesn't mention Farrakhan ONCE*.

You were oblivious to the anti-Semitic trolls in support of the nuclear deal with Iran a year earlier. Hell, you took their side.

You stood behind an article that defined the BDS movement as advocating for Palestinian rights and cast the Brandeis Center as opposed to Palestinian rights. You don't have the first clue about what anti-Semitism is.

That' so true. And a hallmark of new journalists. Like Weisman, Beinart. They are not scholars who truly study or journalists who consult experts. . Just people who write what you think. Like people at a cocktail party. You want to know about antisemitism, you read Wistrich.

So does this mean you’ll be giving equal time to all anti-semites that are “starting conversations”? I don’t want to read NY Times articles about “conversations” started by Ilhan Omar anymore than “conversations” started by David Duke.

Living in one country while supporting another as your 'homeland' is pretty much the definition of 'dual loyalty'. At some point we're going to have to make a choice, and Ilhan is right to bring it up. #1loyalty

As a US citizen, if I said I was pro-Great Britain, I wouldn’t be accused of dual loyalty. The only reason it gets brought up with Israel is anti-semitism. But you are right, it is your fist amendment right to be an anti-semitic bigot.

This is incredible. Jonathan Weismann touts himself as a champion of combatting anti-Semitism and yet he spreads PROTOCOLS OF ZION-TYPE THEORIES AT THIS SAME TIME! Amazing.

And makes money at it. Those Jews - always about the money. LOL No one is less self aware than Weismann. A gift for him. A curse for the rest of us.