People, the difference between a 52-48 Senate and a 53-47 Senate is really and truly not worth undermining confidence in our democracy. Or maybe that’s just me.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1061335051294728194 …
Show this thread
-
In this case, the votes should be counted without disruption. Court cases should be heard and decided without drama. And everyone mobilizing for war should remember that the outcome will not change the balance of power in government.
Show this thread
That is all. Now everyone go back to your screaming. I have laundry to fold.
-
-
Was about to give you props for doing a solid and explaining what you meant, then, this. Dude, please be better than this. Unless you want us all to continue losing faith in
@nytimes ? -
Showing contempt for their readers is part of their thing now.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And that's the heart of it..."I'm smarter and better than you. I am above this."
-
Yep, that's what I got out of his statement as well.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Your contempt for the readers of the
@nytimes is enormous. What's worse is your lack of understanding that all of these undecided races affect real people. Their representation matters, and you have no respect for that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How arrogant. The NYT has really gone downhill in the past year or so. Anyone need to be lent a scream? Pass it on!
@infinite_screamThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the archetype of a NYT response. Anyone responding to their reporters or editors is screaming. There is no valid criticism. Ever.
-
There are two messages in this response that are genuinely infantile: 1 - doing laundry is more important than taking in reader responses 2 - everyone responding to me is screaming.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But you caused the problem with your arrogance and inattention to Critical Thinking. Your attitude is just terrible. There has to be someone in charge at The NYT. Smug twits don’t cut it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, thanks for the 'both sides' take when it's never been a more clear case of one side wanting to count all the votes and the other attempting to stop that from happening. But sure, very important to let the masses know we're all just the same bunch of schmucks, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ummmm excuse me, Mr. Gillum being elected as governor of Florida is a pretty big deal. AND a complete Republican controlled state of Florida would be horrific. It might not mean anything to you but I have to live here. Take a seat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should have just stuck with your laundry in the first place.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See, and now that you've clarified, we all agree with you.
-
He has, pretty clearly. It was my first take of the original tweet, but then I wasn't sure. Now, with this world problem solved, I can go get stuff done.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can’t even explain your poorly worded tweet without being smug.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So you say something utterly undemocratic and then make it clear you have no interest in, or respect for, our response? NYT sinks further into being a state paper working to undermine the country. Cool.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.