No, they are actually way above what you consider reporters. If we have to depend on what your definition of a reporter is then we will never learn the truth. Thank you James as you and your team are truly appreciated!!!
Yo, @JamesOKeefeIII, don't call your minions "reporters." Ethical reporters identify themselves upfront. They do not hide and squirrel around.https://wapo.st/2Q5MQ3u?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.d63bbf5affd7 …
-
-
-
Get smart. Read up on ABC v. Food Lion, when ABC reporters posed as employees to bust Food Lion and the grocer won a huge judgment against ABC for deception in 1992. The jury award was eventually thrown out but it changed the way reporters do their work.https://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/09/arts/beyond-abc-v-food-lion.html …
-
Food Lion distinguished b/c actors took paychecks from Food Lion, so the fraud claim stuck. The jury never saw the actual undercover video. You don't have to "like" O'Keefe to see the danger in government hearings about who is and isn't a "reporter."https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/30/mccaskill-attack-on-investigative-journalism/ …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's called real journalism, Jonathan. Something the hacks of the lamestream media no longer do unless it involves Trump and his inner circle.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What are they if not reporters? Pink Flamigos? We record our conversations with others; and publish them. Their words not ours. We don’t obfuscate or quote anon sources. But thus isn’t about techniques is it? This is about power. The irrefutable evidence exposing sacred cows...
-
Gotta love that kickass
@JamesOKeefeIII has 466k followers but doesn’t get a blue check mark but yet somehow weirdo@jonathanweisman only has 66k followers and somehow does merit a blue check mark... - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Since when have hidden camera stings not been considered journalism??? Since the democrats started getting hit with them.
-
NYT un many ways stopped doing real journalism years ago, so Weisman's confusion is understandable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not like 60 Minutes has been doing this for 50 years or anything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re just not used to actual journalism, Bravo
@JamesOKeefeIII keep up the good work! Rest of the news needs to watch and learn!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shouldn't be a problem if she has nothing to hide. In fact it would be to her advantage if she was truthful and reported as such. “Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry Bro. Truth is truth, whether you like it or not. Project Veritas and
@JamesOKeefeIII have opened our eyes to the truth. It is called undercover investigative journalism. No more living in a bubble of lies, bro. Too many people are seeing these corrupt people. Candid camera!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you develop selective amnesia? What about the Mitt Romney “47%” undercover video? Was played nonstop by the media, probably cost him the GE
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If this were true, 60 Minutes wouldn’t exist. Undercover journalism is actually a thing.
-
20/20 called....
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.