cc: @SenatorCollins if you still believe Kavanaugh won’t overrule Roe or severely limit it then you better prepare for your senatorial career post-2020.
-
-
-
Collins knows... she just doesn’t care. Hopefully the great people of Maine (especially the women) will repay her with early retirement!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I honestly dont understand why it would be a bad thing for the states to vote and decide on the subject of abortion. Why is this so bad? Honest question
-
B/c that would be the democratic, compromising and Constitutionally correct thing to do.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
"Forced her to carry" what? ... a beautiful baby. Open your eyes
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
That sounds like an astute and accurate take on what legal scholars have said and written.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He never says it was correctly decided....that’s the clue
-
Either it was or it wasn't. I really would have liked for someone to have brought this issue up in front of his wife and those beautiful daughters of his. Then maybe he would have a definitive answer looking at them in their eyes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who voted for Roe v Wade? It was the biggest example of judicial overreach; judges making laws because progressives can't win at the ballot box
-
Who voted for school integration?
-
You make Kavanaugh's point perfectly.
-
Which point? Did he opine that minorities in a democracy just have to sit around and wait for the white men to give them rights?
-
Which point? That rulings have gotten overturned throughout history. Plessy v. Ferguson was once law. Now it isn't. What makes Roe v. Wade any different?
-
Nothing. Where did I even suggest otherwise?
-
If you're going to ask "who voted for school integration," yet don't understand that it took SCOTUS overturning Plessy v. Ferguson to accomplish that, then I can't help you.
-
If the context wasn't clear, I was responding to the implication that courts can't use judicial review on something that the legislature can conceivably make into a law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.