(((JonathanWeisman)))Verified account

He did it while shocking everyone by saying the federal government didn't have the right to force states to take Medicaid expansion money, an unprecedented application of the coercion doctrine. That cost millions of people coverage.

Yes, but that was before GOP's decision to repeal mandate. Now that the mandate--and hence, the "tax"--is gone, it's virtually certain Roberts would vote to invalidate the law. He already said Congress didn't have authority under the Commerce clause.

Do you give similar reminders to Republicans?

Perhaps you should actually read the ruling before making such pronouncements.

THAT WAS A DIFFERENT CASE THAN THE PRE-EX LAWSUIT

A reminder to Republicans: Even John Roberts bought into the patently absurd, made up action/no action distinction used in attempting to overturn the ACA ....and John Roberts killed thousands of Americans by going along with gutting the Medicaid expansion on nonsensical grounds.

I do have moments of hoping Roberts may have glimpses of idea that he controls how he is portrayed in history. Who are justices from past most revered or remembered today?