Jonathan Urick

@jonathanurick

Proud . Attorney ⚖️ alum. OT15 SCOTUS clerk. Originalist/Textualist. NY fan. Board game addict 🎲 Views mine

Washington, DC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @jonathanurick

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @jonathanurick

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  2. prije 10 sati
    Poništi
  3. prije 21 sat

    Btw I primarily learned this from Judges Thapar and Sutton. If you read closely, you will notice that their opinions pretty much uniformly follow this structure.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    🚨 Definitely coming back. Summer 2020. 🚨

    Poništi
  5. 4. velj

    Briefs should be written in a positive-negative format: First your affirmative argument for why you win. Then why counterarguments are wrong. This goes for reply briefs too! Believe it or not, some judges actually pick up the reply brief first!

    Poništi
  6. 4. velj

    Hotter take: all caucuses and primaries are stupid and should be abolished. Party officials should pick candidates that they think have the best chance of winning a general election.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    12 years ago today, Eli Manning and the Giants took down the Patriots in Super Bowl XLII. 18 wins and 1 Giant loss. (via )

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    FWIW- I’m goin w the Chiefs. 31-20.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    NBC/WSJ Poll: Trump job approval climbs five net points since December, hitting his best numbers since May at 46-51. His "strongly approve" rating at 36% is the highest of his presidency on a NBC/WSJ poll.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 2. velj

    Discussing his years as an advocate, Judge Sutton would often say that he *loved* hard questions—they are your friend as an advocate, because they are your chance to address the judges’ most serious concerns. Lean in to hard questions. Don’t dodge!

    Poništi
  11. 31. sij
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij
    Poništi
  13. 29. sij

    My wife and I never baby talk legal realism to our kids. We teach them the general law and Swift v. Tyson. My eldest daughter is 4 and can identify unwritten law brooding in the sky. Adults at family gatherings are shocked when she explains all the ways Erie went wrong.

    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    In other words, the actual Commerce Clause.

    Poništi
  15. 28. sij

    I know I’m late to the party, but we just finished season 1 of and WOW. Outstanding. One of the most entertaining shows I’ve seen in years. Can’t wait to start season 2!

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    For 2d Amend Incorporation buffs: Below is an 1866 newspaper article discussing the rt of southern freedmen to bear arms for self-defense. It quotes the original 2d amend., links to military drilling, and then segues to the rt of armed self defense. A mix of old and new.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 27. sij
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    The viral thread quoted below is missing essential context and contains numerous errors. It does not reflect the latest evidence. Here is a new thread with the facts:

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 24. sij
    Poništi
  20. 24. sij

    If you want to read the stay-application briefs, here's a link to the SCOTUS docket page:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·