@jason_koebler @jonathanmayer @motherboard hold on let me check if http://vice.com can securely receive the email
Hillary Clinton’s personal address couldn’t securely receive email. But… neither could her State Department address.pic.twitter.com/JNHkSutYlc
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer@JuliaAngwin For some--but not all--values of "secure". The chart is about transport security only; there's much more.Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer@jsvine Well, she didn't even have a government address.Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer@AboveTopSecret Thats b/c every USgov officials emails Personal or gov use are all duplicated rerouted to a server in _#NISThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer My real security question is whether clintonemail is more or less hackable than State's email servers. Tapping fiber is hardThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer@CasparBowden Cert Error doesn't change the ability to securely receive SMTPS / STARTSSL mail. Even self-signed certs work. -
@jonathanmayer@CasparBowden It affects identity, not confidentiality. Given that no SMTP server requires a CA-authorized cert, no issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@jonathanmayer@zackwhittaker That's her current provider (MX Logic). No one knows what the local server was running pre-2013.Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonathanmayer@glynmoody That by itself means little. The cert system itself is not secure, -
@TM_Eubanks@jonathanmayer which of course makes things even worse... - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.