Hot take: I don't think the House of Representatives has any obligation to retain a chaplain who uses prayer to criticize their policieshttps://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/paul-ryan-house-chaplain-tax-bill_us_5ae22593e4b02baed1b83cf6 …
-
-
It's absolutely routinely used to describe a university withdrawing a university platform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, I see. So it's only an illiberal menace when you DON'T control the levers of power.
-
weird how that view completely stacks the deck in favor of the powerful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if you are powerful enough to control a platform and deny access that’s ok, but if you aren’t powerful and don’t control a platform and attempt to deny access to someone else’s, that’s an affront to free speech?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It seems to me that a state actor like the house of representatives has a different obligation to allow for free speech than a private entity would. They can't withdraw their platform because, in some sense, they've created a public forum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"denying," as in protesting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you see what you’ve written here? The snobbery and elitism baked into this twisted worldview you have?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
