1. This is a good question. I'll offer up some thoughts in response.https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/912509033403252736 …
-
-
Not trying to be a jerk here; it sounds like you agree with the definition but the number of people it includes makes you uncomfortable.
-
Your psychoanalytical skills aren't required to understand how I straightforwardly described the definition as used in the paper of record:pic.twitter.com/7UxyNLtY6R
-
This is an argument from authority, not a definition and papers often avoid using charged terms in ways that could be considered partisan
-
The definition you've offered is a tautology that doesn't describe an real belief but can only be used to refer to the politically marginal.
-
Anyway I appreciate the attempt at clarification. I hope you understand why many people don't find that definition persuasive.
-
I think you're making decent points. But you agree there are important differences between conservative, alt-right, and KKK/Nazi.
-
The common threads matter, but having one term ("white supremacist") to describe them all collapses distinctions, with bad consequences.
-
and I assume you'd agree that the logic of "if white supremacists support you, you are one" is bad reasoning.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Except that the Venn diagram of the two groups is just a circle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is explicit vs implicit white supremacy really that important of a distinction?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
White supremacists talk about white supremacy. Plenty of con refuse to acknowledge (even to themselves) many of their policies foster it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.