Okay- I know I maybe dont have the full story, but what I know is that: SBX access to everything is revoked because of suspicion that she have leaked info about a vulnerability she have found. I very very much doubt that is what have happened- but lets say it was true...
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @jonasLyk
well in my opinion, we can't judge this situation until we know if she did that or not. peoples at Microsoft seems to hate her a lot, soo ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KLINIX5
i once offered to help validate a finding- but was told it was against the rules so it was impossible. and nobody would ever know it.. but even if- we are talking something thats worth max 2000$, do not justify such actions at all. time spent on that bullshit cost 10x
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonasLyk
You do realize that illegal stuff can make the bug worth 10x of it's original cost ? I mean MS isn't the only one who pay for those findings.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KLINIX5
what ? There is plenty of legit brokers there is no reason at all to do something illegal... But- we do know, she found 2 vulns, not logic exploits- more classic memory corruption style. If they where remote, I am sure the posts would have reflected it. So MAX EOP
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
it sounded more like information dislosure though- like aslr bypass or maybe DOS. Even if it was EOP- it would have very short halflife , since they are also reported to ms(how else would they know?) We are talking about less $ then Ballmer could do coke for in 5 minutes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.