By abruptly closing Russia probe - and declaring that there was no inappropriate activity - when it’s pretty clear Mueller isn’t done yet, the House Intel Committee is making it harder for GOP candidates to argue that having full control of Congress doesn’t impede oversight. 6/
-
-
What harm would have come to House Republicans by leaving the investigation open and dormant? 17/
Show this thread -
It’s not like Democrats in competitive districts are banging their drums about the Russia probe. They want to avoid questions that lead to their opinion on impeachment 18/
Show this thread -
But the controversy over the credibility of the House GOP probe and report gives Democrats in competitive districts an opening to remind voters of Trump’s Russia problem by framing it as a power-check issue. That is, two birds, one stone, no impeachment talk. 19/
Show this thread -
Sure, framing it that way opens the door for the impeachment question, but that’s easily deflected by saying Congress needs to be able to do oversight to find out what happened, not to judge Trump before all the facts are in. 20/
Show this thread -
In the interest of circularity, I come back to the original point: I don’t understand the House GOP’s strategy here. It does not seem to be one that helps them. 22/
Show this thread -
I’m not a political strategist, so I’d be very curious to hear arguments for why l’m wrong and this is the best strategy for the House GOP. Fire away. 23/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When you have the entire intelligence community against you, it is an uphill battle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.