I don’t think there is much to this threat but the agreement was non-disparagement as well as non-disclosure. So could include untrue things
-
-
-
Either way, proving breach of the agreement would require disclosure of many many things Trump would never willingly disclose. Paper tiger, indeed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a Jewish, can confirm.
-
Neither, but as a Catholic, got confirmed.
-
Confirmed as what, still not sure. Only the guilt remains.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
But an appendix only leaves you scarred after it's removed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course, if they bring a suit we’d need discovery to see if slander and libel holds up...
-
discovery would be
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If
@POTUS sues for defamation ine defense for Bannon is to prove truth- which would require subpoena of those involved.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hate it when mommy and daddy fight.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JTSantucci
@ABC Boy, would that be stepping in it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not necessarily. There are many reasons to at least try to enforce NDA, if there's a legal basis to enforce it, particularly so called anti-disparagement clauses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ya think??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good thing you're not a lawyer......
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.