You don't see an issue here if they have to use a static score?
-
-
Replying to @MEPFuller
Nope. It's a duckrabbit. If you want to see a tax cut you can. If you want to see growth and revenue neutrality you can see that too.
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @RichardRubinDC @MEPFuller
What about permanence though? If dynamic scoring can't be used to show no increase to deficit outside the window, that is significant right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @RichardRubinDC @MEPFuller
If the two large payfors are unpalatable (to borrow your phrasing), wouldn't almost everything have to sunset?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bctu1 @MEPFuller
Oh if they can't get much $ from state and local and interest and foreign min tax, then they have bigger problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RichardRubinDC @bctu1
Definitely some problems, but couldn't you solve a lot of that by preserving 39.6 on the top 1% and by sunsetting?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Irony: using a current policy baseline while writing sunsets into tax law.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They're not using a current policy baseline. The $1.5T is off current law. Corker, for his own vote on tax bill, using partial CP baseline.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Right, but my point is that people are arguing that tax cuts never sunset while writing sun-setting tax cuts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.