@aravosis Haven't you guys done just that smear Hillary? When has there been honesty concerning the Clinton's??
-
-
-
I know the name of every source I've ever published info from.
-
Did you publish those names?
-
no. Anonymous sources are necessary. They are anonymous to the reader, not to the reporter.
-
So when exactly can we trust reporters? They elevate what they want according to their own agenda!
-
trust is the essential component of the reporter/reader relationship. It's been damaged. It needs repair.
-
Yes so you want the WH leakers to come forward?
-
no...I'm saying that the reporter needs to know with whom he or she is speaking.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@jimrutenberg@ericgeller consider the source of these tweets THRUSH...nice mutual admiration society. -
I can't speak to how Glenn feels about me, but I admire him
-
you may want to check if Glenn is one of Rutenberg's "opposition journalism" apostles.I'm thinking yes
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
State's human-rights report was introduced by a disembodied, unidentified voice via conference call, and that made the papers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doctors lose their licenses for that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A truly anonymous source?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i don't know how "journalists" run a story sourcing "10 administration officials" that is proven false the next day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@badwolf303 that's how reporters keep their sources but most require at least 1 other source verificationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.