the FBI said privately. That the FBI is talking privately to the WH about an ongoing investigation is troublesome on a spectrum 2/
-
-
-
of low side being FBI offered story was BS and Priebus said offhandedly it would be nice to have that said publicly to Priebus tampered 3/
-
By administration's own admission, Priebus was more than off-handed - he pushed it to the director, who knows damn well he can be fired 4/
-
There is nothing about this story that is kosher. Where Priebus' actual actions fall on the spectrum of interference matters a lot, and 5/
-
Since the WH already has lied about that to reporters, per CNN, it's impossible to trust what they say now. Even Spicer's clever 6/
-
we asked them to tell the truth line suggests the truth is the original story was right. If that's the case, why would McCabe 7/
-
volunteer that it was "BS" - in the words of anonymous WH officials - breaking protocol on pending investigations? Maybe to suck up or...8/
-
because he was referring to an aspect of the story? So, we're back to the WH saying on background that nothing is true and the FBI 9/
-
not commenting. But at least the president is fixated on finding the "leakers." My bet is they're a lot closer to him than he'd admit 10/
-
But all of this raises an important question: who believes that the Trump camp wasn't in contact with Russia before the election? 11/
-
Certainly, the FBI doesn't think there was no communication with Russia before the election. They say there's no such thing as a coincidence
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Dude - go write an article. We promise we'll read it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.