@Boston1775 it was a smear
-
-
-
which part was untrue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Impugn: dispute the truth, validity, or honesty of. Why shouldn't we always do this, to ALL politicians?
-
the Senate rule says "impute" anyway. Not the same thing.
-
Oops! But now it looks even more like something that should be done! And in this case rings even truer
-
not your oops! It was McConnell! He's a bastard. These guys won't even pretend to allow dissent now
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sessions character is all BAD He will use AG office to suppress voting of minorities
#resistThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts are stubborn, stubborn things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
..But in the final analysis, how much different is Sessions voting rights position is from the entire rest of the GOP?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As Senate Republicans abdicate their duty to be a check on executive power, they own the fallout
#RepublicanAdministrationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@SenateMajLdr That is VERY PURPOSE of advise & consent. I think that you're becoming too senile to recognize this. RESIST! 2/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. He has impugned himself for decades. "call into question, challenge, question, dispute, query, take issue with"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"reading the truth"? CSK's opinion about Sessions is not a fact. It's her calling him racist, which impugns his character.
-
Unless that's a fact. Also, impugning his character is kind of what they were supposed to be doing.
-
It's an opinion, unless you could read his mind. Impugning motives is exactly what you're not allowed to do to another senator.
-
Calling facts "opinions" is just bad vocabulary. And it's what she's *required* to do to nominees.
-
"he is a disgrace to the Justice Department" is not a fact. It's an opinion.
-
Gosh, maybe she should have provided some detail to go with that.
-
And it's what she's *required* to do with nominees. It's the entire point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.