.@jonallendc @LOLGOP Hillary was the Art. I, Sec 6 Emoluments clause. Trump is the Art. I, Sec 9 Emoluments clause. So GOP not inconsistent.
-
-
-
I understand the difference
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. When was that and why?
-
complicated but it had to do with SecState pay increase while she was in Senate. Not same clause, but an emolument issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really? A source I can use?
-
-
so is that why she use the Clinton foundation.
-
Might read re how DT used money from his foundation 4 personals,incl paying attorneys. Try non-partisan sources
-
..amazing rationale: he did what? Hillary is so pure.
-
Purity is not a human feature.... any human after adults get their hands on them.
-
Hillary really did those things: bribes, extortion of bribes, euphemistically called pay-to-play.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are you suggesting there is unfairness towards Trump?
-
I think there are concerns of conflicts of interest and where Trump's business interests and Presidency pose ethical delmas
-
Democrats complain about Hillary conflict-of-interest?
-
Not a Hillary supporter or a democrat. And Trump literally shits on a gold plated toilet, so save the populist crap.
-
new one on me: first time I have got a put-down for being called a populist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also note that the same theory used to attack Trump also requires the impeachment of Obama:https://twitter.com/andygrewal/status/808665457150558208 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You do realize that there are 2 clauses called the "Emoluments Clause": domestic and foreign. HRC's problem was the domestic one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.