I'm still trying to figure out what's shady/murky/troublesome about WJC aides being paid out of multiple pots for multiple functions.
-
-
it's reasonable to look at the reporting and make a judgment about whether it's nefarious. Shouldn't the reader decide?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ah, gotcha. guess i better go back and remove my claim that it was "shady." oh, wait...
-
I also didn't say you said it was shady
-
your subtweet game needs work
-
we can all agree on that
-
lol, his whole article was shady, I can say it.
@kenvogel
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It contributes to the narrative that the Clintons are greedy and love to exploit loopholes for personal benefit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why
@jonallendc, were you that starved for tweets?@kenvogelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.