@ggreenwald
A little history ::pic.twitter.com/Xfer7yhVRs
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
that is why justice is not left up to a "vote". I wanted charges against Bush & Co. did they ask that?
@ABC @FBI @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats @potus @LorettaLynch @vp #NotMyDemParty SHAME on you all
@GroverNorquist Yes. Begs the question: what is wrong with them? What is wrong with us for even considering her?...
@ron_fournier Suggests to me this poll is rubbish. Just can't leave her alone, can you Ron?
@ron_fournier it's really another unfavorable rating
...or that it was a badly-flawed poll. @ggreenwald
@ABC Most of us will NOT vote for her. Doesn't matter that both Warren and Sanders sold out, we shall NOT ever vote for her.
that doesn't make sense. The same people who are backing her think she should have been charged? Curious how ? was worded.
@davidharsanyi sounds like a legal rather than emotional desire.
Obviously, the 56% don't have a law degree. 
Yeah, everyone in the legal profession, knows you don't charge the rich with negligence or obstruction anymore.
Lets get this straight. People who were told 4 months she did something terribly wrong now want her charged 4 not breaking law
.@jonallendc @GroverNorquist Given the law and DoJ's record of prosecutions under it, there would be no charges.
Media ignored that.
not really what's suggested there chief
@ron_fournier Wow, does that speak volumes! Wanted charges but will yet vote for her. New depths!!
Yes. Some very old women. 
why not? could end with not-guility, which could be good for her. @ggreenwald
@ggreenwald It also suggests the poll may have bias.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.