He said that's what she claimed. Did he say it's legal to circumvent secure natsec networks for convenience?https://twitter.com/jonallendc/status/751069431506272256 …
I heard it as him saying he believes that's why she did it. But whatever, "convenience" is hard to take.
-
-
He's also apparently pretending that HRC's definition of convenience does not include keeping info away from FOIA & Congress.
-
yes! Totally agree. Convenient as in it was inconvenient to leave communications open to public/congressional scrutiny
-
"It depends on what the meaning of 'convenience' is..." So looking fwd to at least four years of parsing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.