House Committee thinks WH videoconference call on Benghazi was previously undisclosed. They should have read "HRC: State Secrets." 1/2
-
-
that says there was an effort to find out who was responsible. How could they not ask that question?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, that wasn't "previously undisclosed".
@joshgerstein mentioned it in passing here toohttp://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/11/state-department-watch-logs-detail-benghazi-response-215624 … -
Touche. I'll specify we're talking about details of meeting, not meeting itself re: undisclosed
-
you're not the only reporting that meeting was never disclosed, FWIW. Aimed at c'tee, not you. 1/2
-
you've done some great reporting over a long period of time on this story. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@jonallendc Right, details of the meeting, as far as I have seen, have not been. If you've seen, i'm curious -
Some details of meeting in the book. If they're selling the meeting as previously undisclosed, they don't do much research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.