So they paid her so they could endorse her? Explain the logic here.https://twitter.com/jonallendc/status/745996735017689088 …
she doesn't care that this is politically treacherous territory for her. She could have not put them in her release.
-
-
I guess I'm confused on what's politically treacherous about them endorsing her. Also which ones are we talking about? Buffett?
-
Qualcomm, Corning, Salesforce ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What nonsense
@jonallendc and very sexist to claim that HRC shouldn't have been paid for speeches as private citizen@armandodkos -
Jon's a good reporter. I just dont think this take is convincing. At least it isnt to me.
-
The whole speech meme is offensive on many levels
@armandodkos tell me what man has ever been criticized for it?@jonallendc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or perhaps it's not treacherous.
-
could be that, too. Still a middle finger to critics.
-
also sets Trump tax return trap. They attack; she counters w/info came from tax returns.. Where are his
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.