assume it's in one of the accurate parts?https://twitter.com/BradMossEsq/status/642797865866280960 …
@blucaller @armandodkos @BradMossEsq @voxdotcom maybe at some point. Will be interesting to see if court agrees with DOJ.
-
-
@jonallendc@armandodkos@BradMossEsq@voxdotcom imagine the coverage if DOJ had argued the opposite, though -
@blucaller@armandodkos@BradMossEsq@voxdotcom every official makes a decision on what's personal/work. Not everyone keeps all on personal. -
@jonallendc you guys are too hung up on the server bc you think most ppl can't relate to having one. But we're not former Prez, 1st Ladies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@jonallendc@blucaller@armandodkos@BradMossEsq@voxdotcom Court may say policy is wrong, but DOJ decides if it violates policy. -
@cspkcats doesn't advance the narrative@jonallendc@armandodkos@BradMossEsq@voxdotcom -
@cspkcats@jonallendc@armandodkos@BradMossEsq assuming HRC to be honest,-that they're purely personal, may help her. Except 4 dragging out -
@blucaller@jonallendc@armandodkos@BradMossEsq It's telling that this is on their front page, but Justice lawyer statement isn't. -
@cspkcats@jonallendc@armandodkos@BradMossEsq of course it's their front page.It's@CarolLeonnig, their fearless Gowdy stenographer
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@jonallendc@blucaller@armandodkos@BradMossEsq if court had an evidence of a wrongdoing, they'd charge her. This is a spin by bigoted MSMThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.