Offensive or just oversimplified? "G.O.P.’s Israel Support Deepens as Political Contributions Shift," via @nytimes http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/us/politics/gops-israel-support-deepens-as-political-contributions-shift.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share …
-
-
@jonallendc@mikiebarb in NYT defense (did I say that?) we do this all time w/special interest groups. Why should pro-Israel funders be diff -
@MarcACaputo@mikiebarb@JeffreyGoldberg That's why I asked it if it was oversimplified or offensive. Our $ reporting is often the former. -
@jonallendc@mikiebarb@JeffreyGoldberg hmmmmm. I will marinate and then chew on that -
@jonallendc@mikiebarb@JeffreyGoldberg to be clear: Your question is valid and I greatly respect the NYT and its reporters -
@MarcACaputo@mikiebarb@JeffreyGoldberg I also greatly respect the@nytimes, these reporters in particular. Story just struck me as facile.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@jonallendc@mikiebarb I thought the article was pretty carefully worded -
@blakehounshell@mikiebarb "also a product of a surge in donations and campaign spending on their behalf by a small group of wealthy donors" - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@jonallendc@mikiebarb How did GOP posture change, and on what? GOP opposed Iran negotiations since first floated in '08 debatesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonallendc@mikiebarb A single ambiguous donor quote, "Absolutely, it is a factor." Article also shows no evidence of change in GOP postureThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jonallendc@mikiebarb Lead paragraph asserts causation, article doesn't substantiatepic.twitter.com/L41L31u8iV
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.