How are we defining "wave"?
-
-
Replying to @BrendanBuck
@BrendanBuck 1. GOP SEN wins spilling over into blue/purples 2. GOP winning close GOV races 3. Winning a total surprise (or getting close)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mmurraypolitics
@mmurraypolitics Good to know. We picked up 63 seats in '10, but still had some misses, so just wanna know what standard we're working with.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanBuck
@BrendanBuck@mmurraypolitics Wave = Blake Farenthold Theory. When someone like BF wins, a total shocker, it's a wave.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pkcapitol
@pkcapitol@mmurraypolitics but we already have most of those. universe for those opportunities much smaller.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanBuck
@BrendanBuck@pkcapitol@mmurraypolitics A wave in the House would be more than a 12-seat pickup. Walden had a drive for 245. 250+ is wave2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeSherman
@JakeSherman@BrendanBuck@pkcapitol@mmurraypolitics 250+ is historic for GOP. Would need just 40 Dems for veto-proofing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonallendc
@jonallendc@JakeSherman@pkcapitol@mmurraypolitics let's just set the bar at 291 then.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanBuck
@BrendanBuck@jonallendc@JakeSherman@pkcapitol@mmurraypolitics There are wave degrees. What would be tidal?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RichEdsonDC @BrendanBuck @JakeSherman @pkcapitol @mmurraypolitics cantor winning by write-in
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.