Even with Trump’s own history of serious alleged misconduct, it’s worth considering whether he’d have more authority to defend Kavanaugh if he’d dropped Roy Moore rather than dismissing detailed charges of predation and child molestation https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/us/politics/roy-moore-trump-alabama.amp.html …https://twitter.com/markknoller/status/1044222505697841152 …
-
Show this thread
-
A lot of Republicans are taking the view that the allegations against Kavanaugh are not substantiated or credible enough to warrant opposing him. Trump’s view over time has been that virtually *any* allegation is rendered non-credible by a simple denial.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/02/11/us/trump-sexual-misconduct.amp.html …
10 replies 31 retweets 61 likesShow this thread -
The first argument might be one that persuades the senators who will decide the Kavanaugh nomination. The second one almost certainly is not.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread
The unspoken view: some Kavanaugh supporters think he should be confirmed even if the allegations are proved true.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.