No, I’m suggesting that a museum dedicated to informing the public about the importance of a free press shouldn’t promote the canard that credible news organizations are the equivalent of propagandists spreading lies over social media, which is what “fake news” refers to.
-
-
Replying to @jonallendc @TinderboxCap and
That said, there’s nothing wrong with market forces determining supply.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Right, market forces being a mob of angry *concerned journalists who just got done telling us digital mobs are bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likes -
This is a tempest in a teapot. But they shouldn’t sell the “fake news” shirts. MAGA is fine.
6 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ArmedWh @redsteeze and
I didn’t call you anything, and I agree that threats of violence, and the suggestion of violence, against the president are disgusting.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonallendc @ArmedWh and
Do you feel the least bit of guilt in going from reporter to hyper partisan Democrat back to reporter? Surely you get it, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’ve been open about my work history. I wrote a piece about why I left journalism and why I came back and have discussed it publicly. I strive to make sure my work, which is edited, stands up to scrutiny in terms of quality, objectivity and newsworthiness. I appreciate feedback.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No one is talking about banning shirts. The first amendment says “Congress shall make no law...” - have you seen anyone suggesting a federal ban on the shirts or an amendment to the Constitution?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.