Does crawl-time algorithmic count as algorithmic in Brave’s case I your view? I think it should, even though we use lists too.
-
-
-
Not in my view. This is about the browser. If it ships with a list that the vendor can look at and that the vendor can decide which things go on or off it, it’s list-based. I assume all list creators/vendors do some kind of crawling with algorithms tied to it.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Naïve question: How does list-based prevention differ from list-based block?
-
Not naïve at all.
Prevention typically means stopping the means of tracking (cookies etc) while still allowing the resource loads. Blocking typically means blocking loads, as in content blockers and af blockers. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It be nice if browsers just offered transparency to the user and developers instead of selling "trust". It's a difference between teaching the user and "protecting" the user. Giving my opinion respectfully, I know it's not a popular one right now.
-
I think we’re super transparent. We blog about all changes to our tracking prevention and those blogposts go through review to make them approachable. The whole implementation is open source. And we have a public tracking prevention policy that guides us going forward.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ah yes chrome the only one that remotely cares about publishers
-
nobody forces publishers to use (excessive) cross site tracking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cliqz, algorithmic prevention [since 2017] (in case you want to expand the list)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice thread. Would love to see the same analysis/discussion for the mobile environment & SDK data access
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
, DNA: 