That said, whether the agreement not to enrich beyond 5% is verifiable is a big question. I'm not optimistic, but... http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/world/middleeast/talks-with-iran-on-nuclear-deal-hang-in-balance.html?hp&_r=0&gwh=26D11F1A22BB8420D9C75DCB5C0DD1FF …
Oxidizing 20% U w/out touching 3.5% stockpile or shutting off any centrifuges extends potential breakout time to 2 months. Good 6-month deal
-
-
-
@johntabin NYT has them delinking some cascades, which would be helpful on that. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@cerenomri@JohnAllenGay Maybe, but NYT suggests limit on stocking up LEU. If so, again: Verification. Key to any counterproliferation deal -
.
@cerenomri@JohnAllenGay That said, "you can enrich another ton of uranium, but then we'll oxidize it" does not inspire confidence
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.