Funny quote, real problem; in a widely-used system, *someone* depends on every behavior 
-
-
-
E.g. when we made log sub-ulp accurate in 10.6 and it broke license checking for a bunch of apps because someone had released a library to do SW licenses that used the low order bits of log as a hash function

- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Where is that from?
-
source was mentioned in the tweet
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
worth buying on kindle?
-
it's fun and very lightweight
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Pls fix NO BEHAVIOR CHANGE ONLY FIX
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Is this a modern day koan? Clearly, the only resolution is to re-define "Correct Behavior" as whatever the current implementation happens to do, et voilà: No change in behavior; all bugs be gone.pic.twitter.com/FLnOgsMnoS
-
We could call these "performative bug fixes" since the act of declaring it correct behavior makes the bugs go away.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Unfortunately not unique. I was aware of projects at Sun Micro where the requirements were to 1) fix all the bugs, and 2) be bug-for-bug compatible.
-
Quirks mode has entered the room
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
