At some point fuzzing becomes property testing doesn’t it? Especially if you develop the fuzzer with the code like this.
-
-
-
sure! I don't even like the term "property testing" but consider that to be just a particular kind of fuzzing
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It might be nice to have some advice for fuzzing when you *can't* turn off things like checksums (this happens often in cryptographic code). Are there approaches to "structured fuzzing" that aren't just quickcheck?
-
not sure what you mean here
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
this sort of just reads like a list of ways to avoid writing buggy code to begin with
-
there's plenty of overlap for sure but fuzzing a project all the way from the beginning is basically a superpower
- Još 11 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Advice on turning fuzzing input into input for APIs to be fuzzed. This step is usually manual and very tedious.
-
yeah... but this is probably another blog post, about constructing fuzzer drivers
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Fuzz in depth? That makes it easier to get coverage deeper in your code, without relying on a sufficiently smart fuzzer.
-
what does "fuzz in depth" mean though?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.