Veblen goods by definition cannot be distributed more widely, which given the specific way "incels" generally objectify women makes conservertarian chin-stroking about "sex redistribution" particularly ridiculous
I had originally assumed that the argument was a reductio ad absurdem to make some stupid libertarian argument that, just like we shouldn't use government to give girlfriends to incel guys, we shouldn't use government to provide a social safety net and redistribute income.
-
-
But it seems like the asshole is really serious about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.