Lots of people annoyed about my Obama column, zero arguments for why any of the below is wrong. Because it's right. http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-wall-street-speaking-fees-2017-4 …pic.twitter.com/sC5kkNKK4O
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don't doubt that people want to see Obama speak. But his speech is being presented to the audience courtesy of Cantor Fitzgerald.
What if Cantor Fitzgerald (or its senior employees) have business intrest entwined with <insert book publisher>? Is that not conflict?
No. He's not a sitting politician or a public servant. Y'all are reaching to find a reason for not liking a choice a private citizen's made
I totally agree. I'm just trying to see how far the big$ speech=corruption (optical or not) argument goes. Bernie played it out last year.
If you add a time-machine so he can go back and use the money to influence decisions he made while in office, I'm with ya. Otherwise...
I think so as well he is the best orator in the world. He should have charged them more.
Nah, the first-and-to-date-only-black-president should be paid scale because there's this new standard that only applies to him. Anyone else
"using the office of the presidency as a way to make money for himself with his business so he’s corrupt"
We love to count black folks money
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.