Lots of people annoyed about my Obama column, zero arguments for why any of the below is wrong. Because it's right. http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-wall-street-speaking-fees-2017-4 …pic.twitter.com/sC5kkNKK4O
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Well, I think book royalties are the best example, since they're ultimately paid by a mass audience of interested readers, not an elite few.
Sort of. But advance could easily be inflated and he won't have to pay it back
It could be. An uneconomic book deal could look fishy. But Obama is an ex-president with a huge fan base who's written bestsellers before.
The standard is not to do nothing that nobody could ever complain about. But I think the case about banks is clear.
Banks have major policy interests, bad bank policy can wreck world economy, & proper bank policy in a crisis can involve giving banks money
So voters, especially on the left, are naturally suspicious about the relationship between politicians and banks.
And substantively, it is especially important that politicians not be dissuaded from making policy that harms banks when necessary.
What future political office does he plan to hold? How is this 'conflicting influence' supposed to work?
"Optics"? President Obama is retired, gainfully NOT employed and he has every right to do as he pleases, when he pleases.
Payments from the Koch Brothers ok?
Do you seriously think those would ever materialize? On what Earth?
He did his time admirably, with honor, against the full opposition of Republican forces (of evl) - give him ALL the
Take extra from Mitch!
Call me when he becomes a global warming denialist lobbyist for big oil. I'll care then.
I guess he'll need to get a 9-to-5 or some people somewhere might disapprove.
Exactly. The presidency touches *everything*. This standard demands he sit in a dark room eating saltines until he dies.
A conflict of interest would involve a current official, not a former.
How does he have a conflict of interest now that he's a private citizen?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.